The CSRC’s details of the change were leaked ahead of time, saying that China was awash with economi-tom365.com

The Commission details substitutions was leaked in advance analysis with a large number of economic espionage China sina finance Level2:A shares of sina finance: App speed Kanpan live on-line blogger on a source of guidance public number: Boeing large aircraft have been reported to Wu Xiaoping, said the crash, an assistant to the chairman of the spy, economic espionage. Talk for a while, there is no sound. After all, do you think the spy is still in the novel? As bright as sun and moon, are good, and what a spy. Spy, it’s really around you and me. The first tour of the new year, the leaders went to the people’s daily, went to the Xinhua news agency, went to cctv. It’s unusual. It’s a release signal. What signals? Every leading group will have instructions on the work of news and public opinion. 90s was put forward for the "good" theory: the correct guidance of public opinion, the party and the people’s blessing, public opinion is wrong, the party and the people of the disaster. The new century, and the team put forward the "error theory": the correct guidance of public opinion, the party and country; public opinion wrong, wrong party harm the country and the people. This time, the new monitor put forward "48 words:" hold high the banner of guiding, around the center and serve the people’s solidarity, morale, rampant human, ningxinjuli, clarify the fallacy, right from wrong, connection and communication of Chinese and foreign world, as "a new era, the Party of the news public opinion work duty and mission". That is to say, this "48 words" is the general guideline of comprehensively guiding the work of news and public opinion in the new period. The general policy looks a brilliant, referred to the Chinese and foreign connections, communicate with the world". This sentence can be interpreted as: China media to seize the initiative, if the information should be disclosed by the media, Chinese China, China official spokesman for the first time. If some important economic information or secret is always first published by foreign media, it is not normal in this country. If this happens, the domestic media, the leader of the general policy can be managed, the international media, the pipe can not be managed? For example, the CSRC changed its name on the weekend, and the Wall Street journal got the news two days ago, and publicly disclosed it. The problem is, it’s a very critical financial regulator, and the information about the substitutions is pretty sensitive. How do you let a foreign media know the inside story first and make it public? China’s ministerial level cadres are thousands of people. Why is it particularly important? Because a stock market crash has caused nearly 20 trillion loss of wealth, more than a few local wars cost, other ministers or ministerial level is not. Therefore, the personnel and personnel of the post must be the most important part of the recent work of the Central Committee of the organization, and will be more hidden and careful. How can this information be leaked in advance? Looking at historical reports, the international media has repeatedly cited mainland insiders, insiders, information, whether it is suspected of spying confidential? Are you suspected of spreading rumors? Is it suspected of grandstanding? Whether the alleged pull people into the water? I see, in addition to grandstanding, not a matter of fact, there are a few other serious problems. From Reuters’s resignation a month ago to "hearsay"

证监会换人细节遭提前泄露 分析称中国充斥大量经济间谍 新浪财经Level2:A股极速看盘 新浪财经App:直播上线 博主一对一指导   来源公众号:波音大飞机 吴小平   曾有报道,说股灾中,某位主席助理是间谍,经济间谍。谈论了一阵子后,也就消无声息了。毕竟大家觉得间谍这事儿,还是小说里的吧?朗朗乾坤,都是好人,哪有什么间谍。   间谍,真的就在你我身边。   新年首巡,领导人去了人民日报,去了新华社,去了央视。这不寻常,是释放信号。   什么信号?   每一届的领导班子,都会对新闻舆论工作有指示。90年代当时提出了“祸福论”:舆论导向正确,是党和人民之福,舆论导向错误,是党和人民之祸。新世纪,又一届的班子提出过“利误论”:舆论引导正确,利党利国利民;舆论引导错误,误党误国误民。   这 一次,新班长提出了“48个字”:高举旗帜、引领导向,围绕中心、服务大局,团结人民、鼓舞士气,成风化人、凝心聚力,澄清谬误、明辨是非,联接中外、沟 通世界,作为“新的时代条件下,党的新闻舆论工作的职责和使命”。也就是说,这“48个字”是新时期全面指导新闻舆论工作的总方针。   总方针看起来堂堂煌煌,提到了“连接中外,沟通世界”。这句话,完全可以理解为:中国媒体要掌握主动权,如果有信息,应该由中国媒体、中国官方、中国发言人第一时间披露。   如果有些重要的经济信息或秘密,总是由外资媒体率先公布,在这个国家,那就不正常。   如果发生了这样的不正常,对国内媒体,领导人的总方针能管得,国际媒体呢,管得管不得?   举个例子,这次证监会周末换人,华尔街日报在两天前就得知消息,而且公然披露。问题是,这可是非常关键的金融监管岗位,换人的信息是相当敏感的。   如何就让一家外国媒体,首先知晓内情并公开了呢?   中国部级干部数千人,为什么说这个监管岗位特别重要?是因为一次股灾就造成了近20万亿的财富损失,比打几场局部战争的成本都高,其他部长或部级根本比不得。因此,这个岗位的察人和用人,一定是中组部近期工作的重中之重,更会非常隐蔽和小心。   这个信息,怎么就提前泄露了呢?   查 询历史报道,国际媒体一再引用大陆“内部人”“知情人”信息,这是否涉嫌刺探机密?是否涉嫌传播谣言?是否涉嫌哗众取宠?是否涉嫌拉人下水?我看,除了哗 众取宠不算事儿,其他几条都有严重问题。从路透社一个月前的辞职“传闻”,到这次华尔街日报的继任“谣言”,怎么就一个比一个真,一个比一个实在呢?   这很不正常。   本号略通英文,对外国媒体一直没啥意见,真的没意见,各家的生活版搞得不错,什么大麻烟雾、超模泳装、非洲打猎和其他糜烂生活方式,专栏都写得很有趣。   不过,撇开外国媒体不论,大家应该很清楚,部分外籍人士在中国究竟充当的是什么角色。从商人到学生,从武官到秘书,从记者到非政府组织,大量的间谍正充斥中国。   苍 蝇不叮无缝蛋。中国确实也有很多看关不严的信息泄露源。互联网时代,对信息,再也看不到英国和美国间谍电影中那种老派偷窃,相反,传播机密的方式变得更加 灵活、快捷、隐蔽,所以一旦发生,国家利益损失将特别惨重。当然,不仅国家,大企业也是知识产权和经济秘密泄露的受害者。   无 论如何,证监会这次换人,原本是个挺正常的事儿,市场总在变,干部须交流,中组部定期换个专业人才试试嘛。但华尔街日报对细节的提前泄露,令人感觉有点变 味。换句话说:果然有大批涉外或外籍“特异”人士,能够比中资媒体、比中国官员、比普通百姓,能够更早知晓重要的经济内幕信息,而这些信息,不应该由他们 先知道,先公布。   如此重要的经济机密都能提前知道,那加息、降准、减税、松汇等举动,难道他们能不知道吗?肯定能。今儿推广下,从经济面到政治面、到军事面,更多的机密、绝密是不是正在泄露?   让我们只限于经济秘密,试想,别人知道内幕信息了,早就买好了等涨,或者做空了等跌,那数千万老百姓和数万中国投行分析师还分析个啥?只能当个事后诸葛亮吧,没辙。   落后就要挨打。这个时代,信息不对称,恐怕分分钟得被打死。以后还怎么炒股票?人人去订一份《华尔街日报》?这不科学啊。   每周我们都会写下周的股市预测,还预测个什么劲啊,人家都安排好了,我们往里钻?人家都布好仓位了,我们帮人套现;人家都麻将听牌了,我们点炮。   这次,强烈期待中资媒体能够发出自己的质疑声音。如果中国媒体,可以率先公布下一任美国证监会负责人的名字,那咱们也没什么可说的了。问题是,没见过啊,没那个“本事”吧。   总之,中国果然充斥着经济间谍,中国需要对信息保密事宜,更加小心一点。亏钱,可以认了,但当个傻子,多没劲啊。   有很多朋友问及换人对股市的影响,本号觉得没什么影响。中国的大银行、大通讯公司、大石油公司、大汽车公司的负责人来回调换,或者上调为部委领导甚至是主要负责人,很正常。当然,在国际投资人看来不正常:凭什么随便调换某一上市公司董事长啊?这是中国国情。   中 国股市一月份是假摔,而且做戏有点过了。没辙,几千万短线炒家,能有什么出息,很容易惊慌失措。本号判断,这个春天,和过去多年的春天,没什么区别,还会 涨,大家安心持有就得了。北京那么鼓励放信贷,压制货币工具利率,继续上马重大工程,因此,中国依然会保持较高速度发展一段。发展质量也许不如以前出色 吧,但在全球还是不错的,依然是值得关注的第一等级投资市场。低利率支撑估值,大放水鼓励炒货,你不持有,干站着看?   中国正在猛烈通货膨胀,大洗牌,您千万别看CPI PPI,傻帽投资人才看这些统计数据,傻帽才教学生重视这个。不买房,不炒股,再看几年,你什么也没了。历史对英国有个评价,叫光荣的孤立,“理性”的你,不想自己也那样吧。 进入【新浪财经股吧】讨论相关的主题文章: