puters-and-Technology . If weすっごくat ANYソフトdevelopmentプロジェクトwe can seeより u 0026 quot

puters-and-Technology . If weすっごくat ANYソフトdevelopmentプロジェクトwe can seeより u 0026 quot ; aナンバーfunctionally、geographically and technologically distributed groupsワーキングwith eachオブtheir favoriteセットオブtools . The scenario is quite . plex in theセンスよりeach tool creates a . pleteインフォメーションisland as far as other toolsアレconcerned . Thoughオールthe stakeholders involved in theソフトdevelopment lifeがサイクルプロジェクトandオールthe development tools used such as requirements management tools、test management tools、issue management tools andおそonに右と同じobjectiveオブdeveloping盛り上がるtheよりquality products、there is lackオブintegration between the various development tools . These tools、thoughベストオブthe breed actuallyライブin isolation and rely mostly on traditional broken manual procedures to synchronizeデータオブとtool with the other . As a result、彼らがないよ. Theドワークwell toolsようsiloed point function tools、there is no effective . munication between the d.

.puters-and-Technology If we look at any software development project we can see that a number of functionally, geographically and technologically distributed groups working with each of their favorite set of tools. The scenario is quite .plex in the sense that each tool creates a .plete information island as far as other tools are concerned. Though all the stakeholders involved in the software development life cycle project and all the development tools used such as requirements management tools, test management tools, issue management tools and so on have the same objective that of developing high quality products, there is lack of integration between the various development tools. These tools, though best of the breed actually live in isolation and rely mostly on traditional broken manual procedures to synchronize data of one tool with the other. As a result, they do not work well together. The tools being siloed point function tools, there is no effective .munication between the different development tools. Instead of point-to-point integrations where integrating five different tools requires 10 total integrations, the software development team needs ALM integration platforms that help to establish synchronization between various tools. Here is a look at some of the features of a best of the breed integration platform. Brings considerable savings in development and maintenance costs Web Services Standard or SOA architecture makes it open to any type of software from any vendor including home grown tools or data bases for integrations Makes integrations with other tools relatively easy once the APIs for other tools are available Requires no hard coding of business rules for the integrations as the data layer is separated from the business layer Allows project teams to work on issues from within their preferred tool environment Automates actions on issues resulting from other integrated tools Ensures cross-tool visibility, traceability matrix and process automation For organizations having investments in multiple tools from .panies such as IBM, HP, Atlassian and Microsoft, the integration platform provides two benefits. Firstly, it provides the capabilities to integrate tools from any one of these or other vendors at a relatively low cost Secondly, it fills certain gaps in point tools that may not exist at these .panies Take the case of QC, SharePoint, TFS and JIRA integration. When an integration platform is used, synchronization happens both ways in real-time for Requirement, Test Case and Defects. Besides, any integration scenario between TFS and JIRA can be easily implemented in minutes with drag-and-drop configurations requiring zero coding. Thus, with an integration platform, software development team can ensure effective .munication between tools used by geographically dispersed teams. 。